The intersection of biotech, medtech, and even robotics with
art are all interrelated. Each discipline brings with it creative solutions to
old problems, but along with innovation comes the question of ethics. Animal
testing is generally frowned upon, but is it okay if it’s to improve the human
condition? The line between necessary and excessive is blurry, but I believe
that genetic modification should for the most part be reserved to humans.
OncoMice: Transgenic mice, unnatural but necessary?
Stelarc's Ear On Arm |
Alba, a GFP Bunny described by scientists as "interesting but silly" |
The question I do not yet have a stance on is that of how
much modification is too much. Stelarc’s Ear On Arm appears frivolous, or as
scientists responding to Eduardo Kac’s GFP Bunny might say, “interesting but silly.”
However, Stelarc’s justification of allowing for a possibly more convenient
type of communication gives the project a more than valid purpose. It could
even be modified to be a means of hearing for the conventionally deaf.
Gessert's hybridized iris |
Vesna, Victoria. "BioArt Pt. 3." YouTube. YouTube.
Web. 9 May 2015.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g>.
Kac, Eduardo. "GFP BUNNY." Rabbit Remix. Eduardo
Kac. Web. 9 May 2015. <http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html#gfpbunnyanchor>.
High, Kathy. "The Politics of Empathy." Embracing
Animal. Web. 9 May 2015. <http://www.embracinganimal.com/ratlove.html>.
Gessert, George. "George Gessert: Genetics and
Culture." George Gessert: Genetics and Culture. Web. 9 May 2015.
<http://www.viewingspace.com/genetics_culture/pages_genetics_culture/gc_w02/gc_w02_gessert.htm>.
"World Intellectual Property Organization."
Bioethics and Patent Law: The Case of the Oncomouse. Web. 9 May 2015.
<http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2006/03/article_0006.html>.
Stelarc.
"Stelarc // Ear on Arm." Stelarc // Ear on Arm. Web. 20
Apr. 2015. <http://stelarc.org/?catID=20242>.
Hello Amy, your post was really interesting. It's definitely apparent that bioart and trangenic art motivate such discussions about social and ethical implications. Although I hold my own opinions on the matter, I was wondering whether you think, ethically, animals possess the same rights as we do as human beings? Furthermore, extending the notion that animals shouldn't be subject to research, including genetic modifications, should animals be then used for human consumption? Either way benefits humans but leaves little to no benefit for the species of these animals. Just wondered about your two-cents. :)
ReplyDelete